Superhero Morality Essay Example for Free

Superhero Morality Es regularize?I pin d throw to prove that superheroes be not im example for not abiding by the truth. I am formation immorality as going against was is accepted as good behavior. Superheroes argon very simply state who defend and protect those in need with their extra public abilities. daemon, Batman, the Flash, Ironman, Captain America, Thor and many others have graced us with their cheer in movies, comic-books, and television shows. Their purpose is to save mankind in ways that ordinary citizenry poopt. Superheros argon not ordinary so they should not have to live by legal philosophys that ordinary citizenry go under into place. People ar not supposed to go discover and take the law into their own hands. Essentially that makes them criminals. But let me ask a question. If somebody has a skintn arm and potentiometert open a door isnt it your moral obligation to open the door for them if you endureful? The same thing applies to superheroes, wh en the law is incompetent of stopping people that are hurting people who are unable to defend themselves and the superheroes can, isnt it their responsibility to stop them? As Peter Parkers Uncle Ben said With vast power, comes great responsibility. Take Batman in the series the Dark Knight.For years gangs ran the city with the law being incapable of doing anything because everyone was afraid of testifying against the gangs. People were being killed, stores were being robbed, children were being forced to watch their parents die. Enforcers of the law were in the pockets of these criminals. detestation ran the city, until one citizen decided to do something ab unwrap it, Bruce Wayne. Now Bruce was not a cop, he technically had no authority to go about eliminating nuisance lords but the people with the authority to take out the crime lords were incapable of doing it because of the law itself.Law is supposed to help keep order in the world, but in Gotham it was keeping the crime i n order. So Batman rose. Superheroes are the only ones that can standup and make a transport when the law is ultimately hurting the people it was designed to protect even if it is technically good luck the law. some disagree with superheroes being exempt from the law. E surplusly in a land of democracy superheroes should be on the same ground as ordinary people. Saying that superheroes dont have to expect by the law is welcoming sanatorium. If they can do it, wherefore cant ordinary people?Since Superman can fly into a hostage blank space why cant an ordinary man alike John? John might think that he has the ability to negotiate or stealthily get the people out of the dangerous situation because he negotiates for his job or sneaks out of his house a lot to see his mistress without his wife ever knowing. He has a special skill set that someone on the police force might not have. victimisation the system of logic of if you can do it you should do it it would be Johns responsi bility to go into that hostage situation to save those people.Saying that its okay for superheroes is hypocritical because anyone can be a superhero. It would be contrary if we were saying that only people with abilities no one else can attain could be a superhero. Superman and Thor are perfect examples. Both of these superheroes attained their powers from their lineage. They can do what principle humans cannot. But superheroes like Ironman and Batman are ordinary people with rich banks. So saying they can take the law into their own hands is giving the okay for everyone to take the law into their own hands which ends in chaos.The law was put into place to give structure to a naturally chaotic world. Ultimately if at that place is chaos more bad behavior is going on than good behavior. More immoralities than moralities. Most laws punish what isnt good behavior like killing, stealing, or forging which i bad behavior. Bad behavior is breaking rule, in this case a law. Those actions are immoral, so law is a good compass for what is moral and immoral. We cannot hold people who break these law accountable if the very same person that brought them in broke laws as well.Thats why warrants and other measures exist for the people that are trained to enforce the law. Using Okham razor it simple. People that break the law are criminals. Superheroes break the law. Superheroes are criminals. The issue with that argument is that superheroes are not normal people. They are different hence the super before the hero. If John the unfaithful married man that has a job in negotiation went into the hostage situation and succeeded in getting the people out he would be considered a hero not a superhero. Superheroes achieve what should be impossible.Batman and Ironman are a different type of superheroes but they are superheroes because of their gadgets and genius minds. The men themselves a Bruce Wayne and Tony Stark are not superheroes because they cannot achieve superhuman acts without their gadgets. If, a men, they were to save people they would be considered heroes. But when these men put on their suits and use their genius minds to power them they become superheroes. Because superheroes are not normal people they stay on by different rules/laws. A sort of superheroes code. One for example is notkilling. I can say this and be correct because law is not the decider of immorality. Stealing to feed ones family is a good behavior, the act is not immoral but the person can go to jail for it because stealing is against the law. Lying is immoral, but there is no law against lying. The reasons for laws is the prevent chaos, but the reason superheroes rise is because there is chaos. In the Justice partnership cartoon show Wonder woman left her homeland to stand beside the other members of the Justice coalition because the world was in turmoil.If the law was doing what it was supposed to do, preventing chaos, superheroes wouldnt need to exist. But the law fails at doing that, which is why superheroes have to step in. There I also an utilitarian view. Superheroes have a choice. Either they appraise the law perhaps letting innocent people die or be harmed because the law prevents them from stepping in which would most likely hurt many or they step in and eliminate the issue which would in all likelihood only hurt a few (which would be the villains most likely).I have proven that superheroes are not immoral for not abiding by the law by explaining that superheroes are not normal people so the law applies to them in a different way. Superheroes have a responsibility to abide by their own moral compass and live up to the responsibility of their power. Normal people can be heroes but they have to abide by the law so chaos wont arise. Superheroes rise because there is chaos that the law cant control. And since immorality is being defined as going against what is being considered good behavior it immorality is relative not a law so the superher oes are moral however they choose to save people.